FARIDA ZAFAR ZEHRI AND OTHERS versus FEROZA KHANUM
Section 12 (2), O XIV, R 1, O XVI, R 1 and O XXIII, R 1 Disclaimer on the request of the defendant's counsel to exclude such order on the basis of fraud and breach of trust. Appeals for the plaintiffs by denying such allegations by the respondents were dismissed by the trial court for non-submission of evidence, non-listing of witnesses, and non-submission of evidence on the date fixed for the applicant's evidence. Which, in the absence of such cases, no evidence can be presented. The case was essentially compelled by the parties' requests to raise questionable facts for the facts, even after the absence of a list of witnesses and the failure to present evidence on such date, as expected from the trial court. Was supposed to arrange matters in this history rather than in that history. The impeachment order was set aside in order to instruct the applicants not to prosecute and then to present evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
