Sections 2 (c), 2 (a), 7 and 9 were decided against the appellant for the recovery of the loan. Neither the guarantor nor the guarantor and he signed all the documents, only the validity of the witness's scope of the documents showed that the appellant had only signed it as a witness and that the proceedings There was no importing party that could be held liable in terms of the contract, and therefore could not be prosecuted under financial institutions. Under the Ordinance, 2001, the Banking Court obtained the authority to resolve any financial dispute between the financial institution and the consumer under the Ordinance, whereas in the present case, the appellant was neither a financial institution nor a financial institution. Nor can any liability from the plaintiff's bank for payment of any consumer or obtained by the appellate decree of the banking court, in which case, the appeal was allowed,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
