Section 324 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 342 Evidence of Cage court Court's jurisdiction failed to investigate accused, failed to investigate accused The implication was that he had shot the complainant's brother with the intention of killing him, after which the accused was arrested with weapons and live ammunition, the trial court convicted the accused under Section 324. , The conviction of the accused was that the arms were recovered from his possession. Nevertheless, the trial court erred in questioning it specifically in the meaning of section 342, CR PC, thereby presenting the unidentified verdict as unforgivable and the trial court to inquire into the accused. Should have Each piece of evidence is available on record through its compliance with the provisions of Section 2 342, CRPC, which was inevitable requiring the trial court's remand of interest in the trial of justice. The trial court's decision was set aside and the trial was presented to the trial court. Section af the2, with the CRPC examining the accused, as well as all the witnesses on record before the verdict and its focus should be specifically invited and provided an opportunity to explain its status. According to which the appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
