Article 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), suspension of driving by speeding or negligence by section 320 murder convictions, the accusation against the accused was that he drove his motorcycle very quickly and recklessly and the person affected. , Which resulted in his death trial. The court convicted the accused under Section 320, PPC and sentenced him to 10 years imprisonment and at the same time directed him to pay Rs 700,000 as legal reward to the deceased's legal heritage. Except for the victim, there was no eyewitness to the incident. None of the prosecution witnesses directly indicted the accused for the crime, admittedly the suspect was arrested on the identity of the prosecution witness, who was not examined by the trial court for the nature of his injuries and the cause. Did not consider any disclosure medical legal report. The trial court's decision was also silent on the identity of the accused in the controversial verdict because the person who received the adjournment sentence was suspended by the trial court on the grounds of his appeal and was extended on bail. Was given \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
