Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR JAVED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS

Article 13 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); The more stringent retirement appeal government was the best judge on the completion of Article 13 service, after completing 25 years of his employment. Fitness was decided by a civil servant to be retained in his job, but in the present case the facts were different. Syed was not charged in connection with the censorship convictions imposed long before his retirement that the appellant was charged with an irresponsible attitude towards public work, but this depended on the penalty of the census. Was related to the first charge. Since the first charge of censorship was imposed, the appellant cannot be retired from the job on the principle of double injury, which is also the second charge which was dependent on the first charge, so the appellant is not retired. There were various allegations of legality. The disqualification was independent of the first charge, not the part and parcel of the amigand was set aside and the appellant was reinstated to the service with back benefits. \ R \ n \ r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer