Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAISHTA JAVED IQBAL versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

R4 (1) (b) (iv) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the removal of section 4 from the employment appellant sentenced to permanent absence from duty for almost two years and nine months. Was imposed on the appellant. About three years after he was removed from the job, the appellate department's appeal was not appealed because the appellant was bound, however, the chief minister received a directive that the appellant be special. The permission will be given so that they can file an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal. Under the law, the appellant ruled that the direction of the Chief Minister regarding contempt of delay in filing an appeal before the service tribunal could be regarded as an administrative order and that an appeal could be filed for a regular hearing. Canceled, because it was a special service jurisdiction. Whether or not to delay condolences in accordance with the terms and merits of the individual matters which are delayed, in no way shall I be comforted by the direction of the Chief Minister's Appeal, in which case he was dismissed, famous high court advocate from Jhang lawyer