Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM BHATTI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN SPORTS BOARD ISLAMABAD

Section 49 (4) (e) and 63 employees from the post of Assistant Accountant in BS 14 against the Petitioner, who is the General Secretary of the Union, to punish the employees for unfair labor process. Typist removed. 12, without issuing a show cause notice to him, but without any inquiry against him, the Order of Demotion did not even identify the period for which it would remain operative, petitioner challenging his mitigation order. He has been fined for his trade union activities. The Assistant had further publicized the post of Accountant, which was filled up by the applicant directly before the termination of the application, issued notice to the employees to file a written statement on the petitioner's petition against them. Went, the administration was instructed not to fill the vacancy before. The decision regarding the hearing of the National Industrial Relations Commission's present hearing till the final disposal of the central petition filed by the applicant, was with the Commission's Bench that the Commission had jurisdiction to hear the petition within which The objections of the respective employers were also legally withheld and justice demands that an independent inquiry be conducted to investigate it. The allegations against the employees, but no inquiry was made against the applicant, failed to produce any witnesses in the defense case, despite numerous appeals, from the administration's requests for hostility against the applicant. It appears that all four cases of the applicant are pending when you need a advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer