AZIZ MUHAMMAD versus GENERAL TYRE & RUBBER COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED, THROUGH OCCUPIER
Sections 49 (4) (e) and 63 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Application for interim relief application for unfair labor practice applicant by employees, The builder - who was named ire Tire - was the founder of the establishment and the president of the workshop union, alleging that the employer unilaterally wanted to run a factory on Eid-ul-Fitr holidays and when he was on two holidays. Owners opposed to running a factory so they were transferred from one place to another and twice to a lower position. Was forced to work was proceeding unfair labor by employers. Employers have objected to the petitioner's persistence on the application that the applicant has been absent without permission for more than ten days and, as stated, was an act of misconduct and retaliation against the employer's legal and contractual rights. Yes, there was no retaliation against the applicant. An act of illegal labor by employers was sent to the applicant, but he refused to receive the inquiry letter, but he did not knowingly and willfully participate in the terms and conditions of the inquiry. Which was accepted by The applicant showed that he could be transferred to any government job and that his position could be changed at the discretion of the employers even otherwise it was necessary for the employees to keep up with their management needs. Transfer your employee from one place to another. Counsel for employers stated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Chak 46 lawyer