Find a Lawyer

SHAIKH MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus MESSRS CRESCENT FOOD INDUSTRIES THROUGH PARTNER

Section 49 (4) (e) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Applicable practice of unfair practice by employees against interim prohibited injunction, petitioner / applicant In his application for the petitioners, section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, directed the respondents to file an illegal lock-in, which the applicants allegedly received. Do not refuse to take on duty due to trade union activities, prevent them from being pressured. Applicants have asked applicants to dissolve the union, and dismiss, terminate and exclude applicants, saying that the applicant had also filed an application for approval of the banning order, the applicants said. It was alleged that he had been victimized by trade union activities. He was accused of sheeting and inquiring that he had made an illegal strike and also inciting workers to strike illegally. Resorting to, disrupting, damaging content, acts of adultery It was to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the employees on charges of mismanagement and to bring such proceedings to a logical end. Such a right of the employer could not be asserted. Or reduction because employees are being offered a charge sheet because of their mismanagement as employees of a trade union, it cannot be considered unfair practice with workers. By participating in trade union activities through employees, top civil advocates from Astore lawyer