OI, R 10 (2) and O VI, R 17 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the Trial and Amendment of the appropriate order apply the terms of the appropriate, necessary party, terminology under the implementation of the principles. 0 1 is included in R. 10 (2), CPC Scope Plaintiff applied to have a person applied as a defendant on the basis that he is anonymous to one of the defendants and has also sought to avoid litigation. The main purpose of legalizing the legal party was to avoid legal compensation. Determination of proceedings and influence and finally all questions involved in the proceedings 0 I, R 10 (2) Term questions, CPC includes all matters, is the content of the appropriate decision of the matter but such persons shall The object of the making was to stop the blow. The proceedings and the person must be someone whose interest was feared to be affected even though no relief was claimed against him as it did not extend to those who were not interested. It was likely that the court affected by the proceedings should not be dragged into the front of the case to unnecessarily face the rigors of the case. The court had a great distinction between the parties involved. It was necessary to ensure that no person, who was neither necessary nor appropriate, could be included at the convenience of the plaintiff's court, that such amendment would not harm the opposing party, which would exclude the pre-existing rights. Will exclude it from the base of the proposed claim or attack in the original case. Modification can be granted if the amendment was made without injustice by the other side
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
