RECORDER TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING, ISLAMABAD
Section 30 (c) and 30A constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 constitutional application, authority to vary the terms, suspend or revoke license, issuance of notice by the authority under section 30 (c) of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance. , 2002 Legal licensee (applicant) was licensed with the condition that the licensee will broadcast the channel within 12 months from the date of the license's issuance, and if it did not, the license will be considered a revocation. Further extension of the year, whatever ended, was followed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002. Unidentified notices under Shin 30 (c) were issued by the licensors by the Authority that this unwanted notice was illegal and was issued in violation of the law, and that the disqualified notice before the Authority The issue was decided on 209 2010 but was filed without consulting on 179 2010, which clarifies the legal status of the licensing authority's terms and conditions, indicating that the licensee Voters agreed that if the operation failed to function at the broadcast station within one year from the date of the license's issuance, Will be considered withdrawn. And revoked, a one-year extension was granted at the request of the licensees, which also failed to show how the authority or jurisdiction in the terms of section 30 (c) had the authority or jurisdiction to issue a disallowance notice. Is not an option Which section of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, has the authority to suspend or revoke the license?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
