Find a Lawyer

MISS ZAINAB ATTORNEY OF HER FATHER versus MUHAMMAD JAVED

The application under section 12 (2) section 12 (2), CPC, the decision of the procedure to be adopted by the court of scope in this application, shall not be binding on the matter to be processed, such cases And the court may accept the evidence at its discretion. The manner of decision of such application while keeping in view the nature of the charge made under the rules.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SAJJAD NAEEM v. State 2013 YLR 64
• MUHAMMAD NAVEED SHEIKH v. State 2013 PLD 68
• COMPANIES ORDINANCE 1984 AND ICI PAKISTAN LIMITED 2013 CLD 68
• MUHAMMAD ABDUL RAUF SIDDIQUI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION, GULBERG, KARACHI 2013 PCrLJ 70
• KAMAL v. State 2013 YLR 74
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. v. Mst. FAIZAN BIBI 2013 PLD 80
• ABDUL AZIZ v. ABDUL REHMAN 2013 PLD 83
• UNITED LABOUR FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Labour, Sindh 2013 PLC 88

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Diamer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes