Find a Lawyer

UNITED LABOUR FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY LABOUR, SINDH

Sections 5 and 78 Provincial Employees \ Appointment of Governing Body Members) Rules, 1966, Rr 3 and 4 Appointment of Scope Governing Body Members From the list of names offered by the organization of such members and set Will be set in style. For this purpose government-recognized employers and employees do not have any restrictions on the appointment of a person for more than one term. A ban on the appointment of another body or board member as a welfare organization or board member. There is no provision for The Managing Committee will not revoke its decision to remain safe through de facto ideological principles. \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Miss ZAINAB attorney of her father v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2013 PLD 73
• KAMAL v. State 2013 YLR 74
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. v. Mst. FAIZAN BIBI 2013 PLD 80
• ABDUL AZIZ v. ABDUL REHMAN 2013 PLD 83
• HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK LTD. v. Mian ABDUL JABBAR GIHLLIN 2013 CLD 88
• WASIUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ MANDOKHEL 2013 CLC 88
• RECORDER TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Islamabad 2013 MLD 99
• Mst. SULIMA v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, through Secretary Home Department 2013 PCrLJ 100

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

famous high court advocate from Daharki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes