HAJI MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE
Interim pre-arrest bail of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 468, 471, 420 and 406 of the advertisement, two preliminary evidence was confirmed before the High Court, so far as the accused was concerned: a That the report of one section P was further confirmed by a section P (Investigation) and the second was the statement of the local commissioner, who went to process the document, the question of duplication was still there and the best people for that purpose. Until now, the shopkeepers, who had not yet been investigated by Section P (Investigation), but were not currently available, were delayed in connection with their request for a bail, the accused's bail. The two documents were confirmed under the condition that in the case A Section P (Investigation) called the shopkeepers, questioned them and came to the opposite point, then what was already stated in the two reports. He or she will be responsible for cancellation and the other party may always apply. There was absolutely no muscle
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Sadiqabad lawyer