Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD AKRAM, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN versus MAHER RAEES AHMAD HARAJ

Registration of respondents of Section 154 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 421, 426 and 506 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-Court Appeal FIR, registered a case against police officers The university hostel, who allegedly arrested the accused, deprived them of a certain amount and imprisoned them at the relevant police station for 20 hours despite no case being registered against them. Under the Single Judge, it is held that the content of the petition is preliminary to the case, which has been directed to Section H. Record defendant / complainant's statement under Section 154, CR PC and take action in accordance with law Single judge directed only registration of case against police officers, but instead the names of the appellants in this case Also included in the FIR was the appellant's name, not just the single judge's instructions, but also the action by Pollack. E-Respondents entered into the petition through their lawyer, insisting that the FIR was not filed as was submitted by their petition to the relevant Intra Court police station, and that the respondents were referred to the relevant Section H. He was directed to appear at the police station, who, after his record, would file a statement, a new FIR and then proceed to investigate the case in light of the direction of a single High Court judge. patent advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer