Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABBAS versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (c) conviction of testimony, reduction of both the complainant and the prosecution witness, the real brother was the deceased's sons and sons and since the incident occurred in front of his house, he was present at the time of his presence). There could be no doubt that the complainant and the prosecutor's witnesses had no enmity or animosity to falsely engage in this case, they could not be called interested witnesses simply because of their close relationship. However, they could not be declared the truth of the gospel when the incident did not occur in the manner described by them, it was alleged that There was a firearm shot on the left hand finger, but the complainant had hidden his statement under Section 154, CR PC, stating that the accused had suffered injury at his hands. Also in front of the man, who strongly complained about the truth of his version, the prosecution's witness statement states that when he arrived at the scene of the incident, the accused had already escaped on the spot, at the time of the shooting by the victim's suspect. Was excluded, unable to rely on this statement, in which case the prosecution's witnesses considered themselves sufficient to prove the story false. A. The complainant stated that the incident occurred while he was on a donkey car while dealing with his deceased mother, in which case the case did not take place in the manner prescribed by the prosecution and defense. Which was more condemnable. Defendant's request for evidence from the record was further supported by the doctor who testified as a court witness on the accused. famous lower court advocate from Kashmore lawyer