Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) was the sole accused in the testimony case who had murdered his wife and mother-in-law in his house during the day. The prosecution witness immediately informed the police, who had a father-in-law. The accused, giving all the minor details of the events that happened on the same day, was quick to file an FIR, the possibility of the accused prosecution witness who was proven guilty and a resident of the same area, to face fines, forgery and false accusations. Was rejected. When the incident occurred, the presence of the witness in the house of his daughter (at the scene of the incident) at the relevant time in the house of the accused was known to be very natural and normal. He also stood the test of lengthy and scrutiny and his statement has no purpose in doubting his credibility or preventing his false case from being a false case against his son. Evidence of the second witness, who is a resident of the same area, arrived at the scene of the shooting and saw a double-barreled gun in the hand of the accused, while both were lying on the ground in the victim's wound, from another witness. There was no connection whatsoever with any of the parties, neither was there any enmity with the accused, nor was he a free and unwilling witness. The Ocular Account is further aided by medical evidence which revealed that both women were described as death witnesses due to fireworks injuries, location, duration and nature of the injury as described by the complainant, The post-mortem report has helped replace the suspect by the deceased's relatives and survivors. It was unusual for Ann to be his own wife and other independent witnesses. immigration advocates contact from Skardu lawyer