SYED ISRAR AHMED versus STATE
Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 419 and 420 Guarantee Grant with the accused / applicant contacted the co-accused and after selecting the plot by introducing himself as a telecom company representative. Inquired about tower fixing plot. Complainant survey fees and other charges were demanded but the complainant, after becoming a suspect, was handed over to the police, the accused's bail application was dismissed by the trial court, the accused under section 420 of the complaint Damaged, PPC was not guaranteed and Section 191919, PPC was not attracted to the case of the accused as it was mainly involved in fraud and impersonation but in the case against the accused the fraud element disappeared. Was, the charges against the accused did not fall under the Prohibition Clause 497, the accused was allowed \ r \ n \ r was n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer
