MST. SHAZIA versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 109 and 34 bail, further inquiries were granted at the residence of the accused at 10 o'clock at 10 o'clock, which a female FIR has shown Used to go home The accused and other persons also went to the accused's house. The victim's house also objected to the meeting of the other persons. There was no innocent dam as he was found at the victim's house during the strange hours of the night. The presence of witnesses killed there and on the spot in the victim's house, the victim fiercely complained about the prosecutor's story, even otherwise, it was alleged that he had taken her body to Japan when his co-accused. Had hit her on the head. Be an incredible story, there was no direct evidence against the accused to link him to the commission of the crime and his case was presented under section 497 (2), the CCP in its competent jurisdiction. Invoice submitted to court During the course of the investigation or trial on any matter, the court was not authorized to accept the accused's bail and after the trial and bail, no restriction was imposed by the courts for approval of the accused's bail. Was gone No conviction could be prevented because the accused was admitted in bail, on bail, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Talhur lawyer