AHMAD versus MST. SAKEENA BIBI
For the Clause 42 statement, the plaintiff resorted to the defendant's findings in favor of the plaintiffs regarding the conversion of their deceased mothers 'inheritance that the plaintiffs' case was that their deceased mothers belonged to the Shi'ite profession Died conscious The plaintiff, who feared her second mother to be his step brother, was not his father's descendant, but was a man whom his stepmother married before his father married the plaintiff. He further stated that after the death of his nephew, his widow had entered into a second marriage The plaintiff claimed that he was the sole heir of the deceased nephew and the defendant, who was his half brother and other Those who entered the marriage were likely to be the widows of the deceased, but did not have any share in the inheritance. The property trial court decided to file a case for his deceased cousin, but after appellate court appreciating the evidence on record, the trial court dismissed the appeals court's revelations claiming that the defendant's maternal uncle. The community was Sunni and its property-based mutant was right. Oral approval has been granted and the documentary evidence on the record has fully proved that the defendant was PL's step brother. The evidence on record in the evidence also proved that the plaintiff had already established a case related to the same issue. The plaintiff, who was acquitted, refrained from his own words and conduct and did not come to the court with open hands. With regard to the judiciary, the High Court agreed with the appellate court's findings
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Qazi Ahmed lawyer