MUQARAB AKBAR versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH REGISTRAR
Regulation 23 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Appeal Examination, University asked for controversial papers, showed the student's father, but no answer to any question was marked and Nor were there any traces of wrongdoing. There is a contradiction in the total marks given to the students or recorded on the papers; the constitutional petition shall not disclose any code of conduct, irresponsibility, fraud or misuse by the Examiner in marking the controversial paper. It was appropriate to dismiss the constitutional petition by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Nilam lawyer
