MUHAMMAD JAVED versus STATE
Sections 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 178, 157 (d), (c), (h), (8), (1), 156, 32 (I), 16 and 2 (5) The trial court's report revealed that after the indictment, the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was being recorded and the trial was likely to end within six months as the trial had already begun. Therefore, it was not appropriate to disagree on the facts. It should not be a case that it is prejudicial to any party whose hearing should be dealt with by the High Court as directed by the trial court and expire within four months instead of six months.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Pindi bhohri lawyer
