Find a Lawyer

NOOR KHAN versus FALAHUD DIN

No evidence on file to show that respondent / defendant was delayed eight months in filing FIR for Section 497 (5) Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail. The suspects did not misuse the bail exception. Or there was a chance it might be fugitives. The offense against the accused did not fall under the 497 prohibition clause, the CCPC civil litigation was going on between the accused and the applicant / complainant and it is not yet clear whether the criminal intent to defraud the controversial check. Was issued with or not. The complainant's challan was presented in court and the trial was started. The reservations regarding the cancellation of the bail were different from the bail approval and the extraordinary grounds were required for the cancellation of the bail after the bail was rejected. When bail was granted bail. For reasonable reasons it was not an appropriate case for the termination of the accused and the bail, for the strong and extraordinary grounds necessary to obtain it. Trial not available Trial court exercised jurisdiction in approving bail for cancellation of bail to accused, was dismissed immigration advocate from Peshawar lawyer