Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN ALIAS BHAIDOO versus STATE

A complaint was filed immediately to the FIR for appreciation of the section 302 (6) evidence and the second witness, although the witness had no motive or strong animosity to lie against the accused in this case. Gave evidence of his presence at the crime scene. At the time of the incident and at each other important points were strengthened. The defendant admitted that his nephew was killed in good grave and sudden provocation for compromising his toe in the complainant's house, but he failed to confirm the specific request, which was not So comprehensible, neither convincing nor convincing, nor was it deconstructed by a piece of evidence when the prosecution version was more reliable when put in a juxtaposition with the defense version. And confidence. The accused and the parties are known to have close relations, the question of alternative or misrepresentation does not arise d id No previous rivalry between the parties was not available. Ocular testimony was proved by medical evidence of the crime weapon. There was no defense to the recovery because the accused with the intention of murder was declared a confession and sentenced to death. The suspects were confirmed in the circumstances immigration advocates email from Kohat lawyer