AHMAD YAR versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was recorded in this case after consideration and consultation after the FIR as the relations between the parties were not as strained as the prosecution alleged. It was reported that the incident took place at 5.30pm in the month of December. There was enough darkness and it was not possible for the witnesses to have seen the accused and it was also seen that the deceased's person had been allegedly injured, but there was one blank after the accused appeared. Not captured. The sugarcane field reached the deceased and then opened fire, but there was no black paint, no burning or burning reports around the wounds on the victim, which proved that witnesses were not present on the spot, records show. That the deceased was a woman and had the habit of abducting women, unless she had twice abducted a woman whose death was addicted to heroin, in which case the accused's false involvement would not be ruled out. Suspicions were spreading to the record level, and the sentence imposed by the trial court on the accused was increased to the benefit of his suspicion.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Tank lawyer