Find a Lawyer

HABIB ULLAH versus MAULA DAD KHAN

Article 60 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), 0 I, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for possession by way of return of mortgaged property, enforcement of party, application for suit property to original owner. Source mortgage has a mortgage. , Under the MLR number under Land, the Land Reform Authorities took over through various mutations, the property was kept in the government and it was purchased in the interest of the original owner / mortgage by the government respondents / successors. ? The Government and the petitioners / shopkeepers filed the petition under OI, R10, CPC to act as defendants on the ground that they have been the shopkeepers for the last several decades. Occupying, he took up residential houses and the applicants claimed that since the rights were made in their favor, they were at least PR upper party, if not necessarily the applicants for its implementation. At the hearing of the petition filed by, the trial and the appellate court rejected the simultaneous amendment. The petitioners had filed a constitutional petition against the joint orders of the courts in favor of transfer of transfer of underground application by the government. Illegal activity did not save the applicants any right, with the assertion that it was only to take possession of the land, that the applicants would not have to wear any rights if they had invested anything. Was at your own risk and cost law firms from Bhakkar lawyer