MST. ZUBAIDA versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN THROUGH L. RS .
Sections 12 and 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O1, R9 defendants sought to enforce a contract of sale in a separate suit against the plaintiff / plaintiff's mother's mother. The husband owns the suit property as the original owner. The property was granted to him in favor of him and then his son / defendant could not contract a valid sale with the promise, since he was not the owner of the property, the suit for specific performance was consolidated. Was dropped and the announcement was dropped. After the mother's death, her three daughters acted as legal representatives who did not appeal the dismissal of the case. The two daughters, who were also the plaintiffs in the specific performance claim, acknowledged in their written statement. His brother / adviser was the owner of the suit property. Therefore, he could sell the same in favor of the promise, there was no benefit to the third daughter's imposition in the former suit, as he was deceased s deceased sss deceased sss deceased sssssssssssssss in both suit. by appeal by appeal by appeal by appeal by appeal of appeal appeal second appeal appeal second appeal appeal second appeal appeal second appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal appeal. Appeal Appeal Appeal Appeal Appeal Appeal Appeal must be accompanied by an appeal that may be made by the Court of Appeals. could be could have been.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Swatmingora lawyer