ASIF LATEEF versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
Sections 337A (i), 337F (i), 341, 506, 148 and 149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition sought for the accused to face trial, after the initial evidence, the accused sought After leaving, the complaint was dismissed to the trial court (magistrate). To stand trial, but the Additional Sessions Judge rejected the complaint filed by the applicant / complainant in exercise of the revised jurisdiction, the reviewing court held that the witness's statements were recorded in two different types of handwriting. And no explanation was given by the relevant magistrate. The review court's observations found no power because copies of the evidence on the record reveal that the magistrates had signed and marked the thumb by witnesses, there was no allegation in the Prima facie proceedings such as The revision court has indicated. Passing an unforgettable order, the trial magistrate of the magistrate revealed that when satisfied with the use of a conscious mind, the record was sufficient to link the grass culprits available on the prime aspect to the crime, That impeachment order approved by the amending court, which is not enforceable, was directed by the trial court to fast-track the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Mubarik Pur lawyer