Find a Lawyer

KASHIF ALI KHAN versus SHER JAN MUHAMMAD

O 1X, O XVII, Rr 1, 3 and O XXX, R 4 (2) Despite two occasions, the right to re-examine the cross-examination, the defendant's lawyer showed his inability to examine the defendant's testimony. , The trial court closed defendant's right to a trial. The defendants' cross-examination claimants testified that the trial court had no jurisdiction to terminate the right to cross-examine a witness. O Power XXXX, R4 (2) In the CPC case, with the departure of the court, the power of attorney or power of attorney was appointed and his attorney was unable to investigate the testimony of the defendants. The spouse was not only against the provisions of the law but also the mismanagement. The trial court had jurisdiction to discontinue the right to cross examination iii. Such circumstances were routinely and on several dates the case was adjourned and the trial court did not exercise proper mind under the trial. OXVII, Rr 1 and 3, CPC, therefore, the order passed by the trial court was not legally valid, especially when there was no notice to give the defendant a last and last chance for that purpose. Neither the plaintiff nor the plaintiff himself were serious about it. While preparing their evidence, keeping the trial court's order on the legal plane, the High Court refused to maintain the same in view of the facts and said that the trial court There has been a slight slowdown in approving such an order and in this case the trial court may be postponed. Make available to the plaintiff at the next hearing date in case some of the costs the lawyer directs are paid pakistani advocates Rahimyar Khan lawyer