ZABTA KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, LAHORE
Article 199 Constitutional Application The auction was subject to a call deposit to collect rights in connection with the fees related to the cattle market of the Tehsil Municipal Administration. Was not arranged by the municipal authority and the contract was given to the respondents which was heard by the municipal authority which stated that instead of the applicant, another person submitted the call deposit but in the bid. Call deposit was returned to relevant person so did not participate. It was issued by the bank that the call deposit was withdrawn in the name of the applicant and not in the name of any other person, the record of the municipal authority also did not support the position of the administration which was withheld. It was unbelievable that the applicant was not even present to participate in the auction after collecting enough money on the day appointed by the municipal authority, as the representative of the district liaison officer to observe the proceedings as directed in the auction. Didn't exist? The award of the Contract Awarded by the Municipal Authority to the Respondents through the Municipal Authority to all the officers and sub-municipal officers in connection with the cattle mandis is given by the municipal authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer