SAJJAD HUSSAIN versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, TAUNSA SHARIF THROUGH TEHSIL NAZIM
Article 199 The Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (h) of the constitutional petition and the trade agreement between the competent applicants, were executed by an agreement requiring the applicant to pay monthly installments. But he admittedly made the default in it. The payment applicant, therefore, was not entitled to arbitrary constitutional relief because of his own conduct, and the matter was contract-based, so it is argued that appropriate remedy would be available to the applicant in the court of early civil jurisdiction, if at all. Breach of contract or breach of contract. The merit petitioner's contract could, according to its terms, be terminated without notice so it was admitted that the ineligibility of the notice had no validity. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
