Find a Lawyer

FAHMIDA AKHTAR versus GHAFFAR AHMED

Article 12 (2), O VII, R 11 & O IX, R I3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Under section II2 (2) of the previous order, separating the previous order under CPC Not to keep O VII, R 11, based on the plaintiff's request filed under CPC, after the return of the review by the plaintiff against the order dismissing the defendant's request, joined the counsel and proceedings before the trial court. After being A cause of action was disclosed in the application and was not barred by any law, therefore, under section 12 (2), CPC, A VII, R 11, The source could not be denied, it was to be tried like a trial. The claims made in the defendant's petition led to a case of fraud and misrepresentation in the court, which could not be dismissed without recording the evidence, before the trial court reviewed the plaintiff before the High Court. The trial has been postponed due to. The court filed a motion under the OIX, R13, to set aside the former party's decree defendant's request, CPC was accepted on the basis that it was presented in the case and on its behalf. After dismissing from the review, he was not appointed by the litigation adviser. The notice of the plaintiff and the receipt of the file could not have been issued accordingly since the defendant was found to have no authority before the defendant and his presence could not be re-issued to the defendant. Could be marked without approval. The constitutional petition, under trial, allowed the trial advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer