Find a Lawyer

IMRAN TRADERS versus MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

Sections 24 and 27 were applicants imported porcelain / ceramic tile imposed on General Contract for Taxes and Trade, 1994, Article 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Anti-Dumping Duty, Commission Objects Investigation Power. Pakistan was considering imposing dumping duty against the tiles they imported. Applicants say that an inquiry was launched in connection with their goods without adhering to the provisions of Section 27 of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000, the 2000 Validity Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000, was affected by Article 6. The General Agreement on Revenue and Trade, 1994, with the purpose of imposing duties to end harmful dumping in the public interest, was imposed on an inquiry based solely on anti-dumping duty, envisaged by the Department of Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance. Was commissioned under 24, the 2000 Commission can prosecute. Initiate an investigation after receipt of sufficient evidence, and it is possible that a request from a third country will also be processed for investigative purposes and anti-dumping measures. Authorities were fully assured that: Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance, 2000 would be followed in full and everyone would be notified if the investigation was to begin. Just because the commission was receiving some information did not mean that it was either self-motive or under Section 24 of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000, or of a third-party inquiry. Was started because only such action will be correct in the investigation. Where the requirements of section 27 of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000 best law firms from Jaranwala lawyer