ASGHAR ALI versus CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, LAHORE MUSEUM, LAHORE/CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Regular 10, Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan, respondents to the appointment of Qui Warrento, Lotus Standing Principals, joined the Lahore Museum on deputation and the applicant responded to the question. Challenged defendant's authority in the position. The authority was that the defendant was of high caliber and he appropriately joined that position in the deposition question. The present case falls within the purview of Article 199 (1) (b) (II) of the Constitution, even in such cases the applicant was not required to establish his place of residence. To establish the jurisdiction of the High Court, because the applicant's duty was merely to bring any kind of unlawful interference / irregularity in the notice of the High Court, while the High Court, in compliance with its constitutional jurisdiction, Was fully capable of questioning. About the authority of the public office that he has held in that position, the superior ability of the respondents did not mean that he could be appointed anywhere if you formally observed the coddle and the law. Violating the legal provisions could be issued to Article where his parents' account was made liable for violation of appointment, he was serving in Grade 14, while on deputation he was not only drawing pay. And receiving a Deposit Allowance at the rate of Grade 16 allowance but also at the rate of 20% of his basic salary There was an added burden on the financial status of the ruling, but it also created a sense of deprivation among the employees of the department who were fully qualified. In question
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
