Sections 15 and 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request for Dismissal Request for default of payment of rent and a pre-requisite order against the respondents for filing leave application by the reporters Ex parte order Defendant's request for an order dismissed by the rental tribunal against the original tenant and the alleged sub-tenant was challenged in appeal only by the sub-tenant and dismissed by the appellate court, not the original tenant. The constitutional application is the legality of an order of evacuation only by sub-intents, rent According to the procedure, the original tenant agreed that not all tenants in the appeal and constitutional application for not working on the damaged shop had mentioned that the High Court had claimed that the original tenant was a partner. How did the damaged shop get it in the possession of all the tenants during the previous arguments, but any homeowner failed to present a law prohibiting such partnerships, if any, from betting jw.org en Knowing that a tenant and all tenants take leave in applying for leave will not make any excuse for ignorant law. PRO did not apply to the holiday, such as, but to accept the removal request to rent tribunal had no choice, the tenant was not challenged. The order of eviction before the Appellate Court and the High Court, as such, the sub-tenant had no concrete position to challenge his legal status. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
