Section (78 ()) (d) Election Request Provincial Assembly, Retired Candidate (Defendant) 's Educational Qualification Applicant's request was that the defendant had obtained a BA degree through forgery because the University Bore reply Roll number slip was issued to the respondents The record and the National Identification Card (NIC) copy number and the evidence of the respondents did not indicate that the respondent filled the admission form and roll number slip on his own examinations. While the NIC number finder was not related, the record further stated that the respondents in the admission form A certified photo was present, while the roll number slip contained a certified copy of the duplicate, whose identity could not be established during the trial, the photographs of the respondents and the impersonator were verified by the same officer and at the time of filling. The form and roll number were pasted on the slip and the entry of the entry form by the respondent mentioning the wrong NIC number was not an innocent mistake by the respondent on the entry form and roll number slip in BR, but it did Hiding his identity, the Vice-Chancellor of the university exam made a report of the inquiry committee D had made it easy to present his identity. Respondent did not personally sit the BA exam, but was replaced by a fake degree of BA due to differences in BA's, their admission form and roll number slip and photo changes to the Photo Center. Was issued to the defendant by the University, not legitimate and not forged, but obtained by the counterfeit through fraud.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
