Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149/109 murder, attempted murder conviction, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and interim bail, further investigation complaint His subpoena allowed the defendant's position changed from the prosecution's testimony to the fact that the accused was not named because the complainant in the FIR had made himself an eyewitness to the incident while he was the accused. The incident was reported with other eyewitnesses reporting. The police and all of them remained in their position to be eyewitnesses to the incident during the investigation before recording the prosecution's subpoena statement, making two versions of the suspect himself, one in the FIR and The second is involved in the complainant's subpoena; none of the accused mentioned in the complainant's subpoena was shown as an accused in the FIR, and his bail could not be granted as the accused was allegedly absconding. The case demanded further investigation of his crime within the meaning of section 497 (2), CRPP alleged that the accused was involved in the shooting. Will found. Through his co-accused, he did not appeal the argument, because doing so would put his own life in danger, the accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
