USMAT BATOOL versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN
Article 199 The Advertising Scope Petitioner for Constitutional Application Recruitment was a candidate for the post of incumbent, and his complaint was that the authorities had changed the standard of recruitment. In relation to the recruitment of vacancies, legitimate advertising was a promise about which authority Had considered that hiring the most suitable candidate should not deviate from the advertisement and if the deviation was to some extent necessary to overcome any deficiency / legal malfunction, such changes would be the same as the advertisement. The ad should have been and should have been. In the meantime, every applicant has been informed that if the process of filling the posts has been started during this period, the authorities have not exercised their authority to appoint in a fair, fair and transparent manner, thereby giving credence to the same. Violating and breaking down was contrary to the criteria for shortlisted candidates. And the terms of the advertisement and the same were declared illegal and without any legal authority which resulted in the High Court having made the appointments illegal, invalid and put aside and Authorities were instructed to prepare a fresh list of eligible candidates as per the constitutional request.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
