Find a Lawyer

NAWAB ALI versus SOOFI NAWAB DIN

Soon, CHAP 16, Part B, R15 Court Fee Jurisdiction Multiple Appellants with Common Interest The only reason for action is where the co-owners, co-claimants, or co-appellants were seeking relief under a single cause if court fees were only payable. In this case, through a separate set of plaintiffs, a valid prayer in the present situation sought relief in respect of various variations, which objected to which did not show any single cause of action.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Mst. ROBINA BIBI v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE 2013 CLD 477
• USMAT BATOOL v. BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 484
• ASGHAR KHAN v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 YLR 484
• AKHTAR MEHMOOD v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2013 PLD 484
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. INTERNATIONAL CERAMICS LTD. 2013 PLD 487
• SHAGUFTA BIBI v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, MAILSI 2013 MLD 487
• SHOAIB MUSHTAQ v. MUHAMMAD QASIM 2013 CLC 487
• ALI ATHAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 487

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

jobs for advocates from Kamokey lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes