MST. JAMEEL FATIMA versus S.H.O. P.S. GULGHAST, MULTAN
Article 199 (I) (a) (i) Writing of the Constitution Petition Mandamus Petitions, which were in the interest of the respondent, the tenants in a residential property in possession of foreclosure, were in legal possession on the day they were forcibly disposed of with the help of the police. Was intercepted. All provisions that violate the law and protect the rights of tenants of civilian property in particular were instructed by the defendant to restore the possession of the applicant, which was taken illegally, if the applicants If the tenant is in question, the default for payment of rent for the premises was set up or the cover was personally due to the encouragement required by the defendant to rent it under section 13 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959. Controlling applicants can file eviction proceedings against applicant The police concerned were instructed to take steps to return the seized cover to the applicants. Time and filing a report in the High Court Act with dering
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Gojra lawyer