Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD SHOAIB

Section 10 (4) of the Special Relief Act (in 1877), under section 42 five years, the land allotment / lease scheme provided for the plaintiffs to file a declaration with the claim that they were allotted land for five years. On the temporary farming scheme, there were ownership rights. They were granted, the land was paid and the convention updated in their favor, and the Member Board of Revenue had no jurisdiction to cancel the property suit and the order was upheld in the appeal, There were no documented documents as well as oral evidence. To prove that no special and special order of allotment has ever been passed in favor of the plaintiff, there is no mention of the alleged allotment in the copy of the register of five years' temporary cultivation but it has been stated by the courts No order was taken on the main body of evidence. The record of claims and rights issued in favor of PK for the grant of possession under section 10 (4) of the Government Land Colonies (Punjab) Act, 1912, which in the respective years was jamabandi. There was no registration in connection with the allotment, occupation and cultivation of the plaintiffs, in which Khusra Gurdwari said that till date there was an allotment based on underground lands. Unlikely destruction and the names of the alleged allies were never entered until that time. Not one receipt for poor login payment was presented by the defendants who proved that there was no allotment, no occupancy supply, nor a farmer's voter list. He made it clear that the plaintiff was not a resident of the area where the disputed land was located law websites from Kamalia Musa lawyer