Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL AZIZ versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH D.C.O., DERA GHAZI KHAN


Section 4 of the Demarcation Act (1X of 1908), Article 13 and Article 148 of the Transferred Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 41 of the transfer of mortgage rights in favor of non-Muslim mortgages which subsequently migrated to India in 1947. Created in 1898 and 1905. The deadline for redemption on the occasion of independence, ie 60 years, did not expire. 1947 1947 question After that, the State of Revenue was under stabilization and the messaline fact was created in year 636363 64, in which the application was made. The petitioner's father's name was listed as a mortgage, and as a mortgage the government continued to register such entries until 1980. 81 The names of the applicants were abolished and in 1984 the owner of the suit land was transferred to the central government. Admitted, under the Pakistan Administration for AQE Property Act 1957, the custody of custody rights has no effect. And the application of the Section 13 of the Limitation Act, 1908, as far as the widespread purchase of suit land was concerned only before the rights of the mortgagee in the interest of eviction, which were made in the federal government, and the law on eviction property and homeless persons. The repeal of the (repealed) Act, 1975 states that rights are made in the province, therefore, it is merely stated that rights can be transferred to defendants. Acquired as illegal buyers, the mortgage factum was permanently listed in the revenue records, which were not actually examined by the defendants during the purchase of the suit land so they were transferred to the property transfer clause. 41 cannot be construed as a defective buyer. Act, 1882 The High Court was putting aside the unwanted decisions and orders r \ n \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Digri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.