Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus MIRZA BASHIR HUSSAIN

Section 41 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 39 Law Shariat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 118 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Twelfth, R2 Anonymous Transaction Tons Proof of beneficial ownership to plaintiff for sale. Challenges that in the device cancellation case it is alleged that the defendant, who was his real brother, was merely an anonymous title while the plaintiff was the real and beneficial owner of the property involved in the sale case. The suit was dismissed and the plaintiff's appeal was also dismissed by the defendant in his written statement, which was filed in the previous case, against the plaintiff's claim. But what did the defendant was never presented in the first trial, or to refuse to appoint a lawyer by such claims could be easily proved by the testimony of the lawyer who allegedly engaged. In the previous litigation through the plaintiff but the plaintiff failed to present such evidence OO XXI, processing of the application under R 32, the CPC was never included in the evidence before the trial court nor The defendant only had to face such that such documents could not be pressed into service and relied upon at the revision stage. The defendant did not choose to appear in the testimony to support his son's claim and testimony. , Because his lawyer was not trusted to establish beneficial property in the case of anonymous transactions by the courts. The required requirements for the game were not proven on record law firms from Khushal Kot lawyer