Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ KHAN THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus MEHRAM

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), VI VI, R 4 For the specific performance of the contract to sell the contract, the suit did not confirm the facts of the evidence in the case The plaintiff did not plead in the plaintiff's favor. The second agreement was merely a continuation of some earlier transaction, so the guidance of the default agreement could not be allowed and even then, no proof of the agreement could be considered, if earlier. The evidence on file in connection with the contract should be taken into account. , The whole matter will be dissolved, because under the first agreement half of the balance was paid which was not mentioned in the Plaintiff, the actual payment was not properly waived in the plaintiff's contract, even in the circumstances Was not proven. on one hand Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sambrial lawyer