Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 A (i), L (ii), F (iii), 334, 336, 342, 148 and 149 bail, no further grant of inquiry was armed. With any firearm, but he was reportedly armed with a sota at the time of the incident and according to the complainant, he did not cause any injury to any of the victims during the incident and the injury to Sota Came under the purview of section 337A (i). And L (ii), PPC, which was a guaranteed offense, alleges that two persons from the accused party suffered firearm injuries during the incident, which the complainant stated in his statement to the police. Was pressed, the private complaint filed by the co-accused is still pending before the court of competent jurisdiction. The accused's case was not related to the case of the co-accused, which was granted bail by the accused of the High Court, who was in jail. Behind him, his man didn't need the police for further investigation because he was full. The bail cannot be considered as a conviction, even though the defendant expressed a joint intention with the accused involved in the commission of the crime, it is a question of further investigation, which will be seen after recording the evidence in the trial court, the accused. Was admitted on bail, under the circumstances immigration advocates from Fizagat lawyer