Find a Lawyer

STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, SINDH versus MOOSO

The re-arrest of evidence by the Supreme Court prosecution in the appeal against section 5A5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 against the High Court, established the case completely by presenting record testimony of the complainant and the abductors. And the High Court acquitted the accused. On false speculation and they did not properly appreciate the evidence. Pearson of the High Court's uncontested decision made it clear that the High Court, while discussing the evidence of the witnesses, clearly stated that all the witnesses were the accused. Was involved in the commission of the crime. In an anonymous decision, the High Court, while referring to the evidence of the complainant, mentioned that the accused had kidnapped three persons and demanded Rs 2,000,000 in ransom for appearing with the accused because the High Court The complainant was falsified while it was not according to the records under which he was never declared host but he had completely implicated the accused and others on the charge of abduction and ransom demand. ? The High Court verdict shows that the witnesses had identified the accused, the High Court noted that the complainant and the prosecution witness supported the facts of the abduction. And this encounter happened between law enforcement agencies and robbers during which the kidnapper was killed while the other two kidnappers were released by the police complainant and the prosecution witness, and in their own statements, the kidnappers took the case. Was fully supported by the trial. The facts of the kidnapping and demand of the prosecution's witnesses, the trial property advocate from Khuzdar lawyer