GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF WORKS AND ANOTHER versus MESSRS MALBROW BUILDERS, CONTRACTOR, SIALKOT
Article 185 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, O Xlll, R 1 The delay in the time limit of appeal from the Supreme Court by the federal government cause Question cannot be taken lightly because of reason / prohibition, not mere technicality And due to the extent of the rights of the other, the party cannot be stripped of the proper cause \ and without lawful justification \ sufficient reason is not qualified to be accurately explained and may be different from the case but the officials of the government. I am not gentle, carefree and do not have a curriculum standpoint. The proper cause and question of any error is not raised. Delaying officers / officials who are responsible for such delays should be held responsible for the loss of public exchequer, which would result in any illegal instability by the Supreme Court. Did not deny. Finally, the government cannot be shown a priority behavior \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Battagram lawyer