Section 151 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 8, 12 and 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Trial of the Trial The applicant of the trial court filed suit for the specific performance of the sale contract, while Respondent filed a counter-lawsuit. During the approval of the two suits for the possession and acquisition of the gross profit, the defendants filed an application under section 151 CPC, in which the trial court rejected the request for the stability of both suits and exercised the amended jurisdiction. Defendants halt proceedings in the High Court case. And both suits were consolidated. The justification was a common theme of the claim in the counter suit, both suits had to be consolidated and the decision had to be taken together. The trial court ignored this rule to avoid conflicting decisions. Because he had failed to make a decision. Obligatory and Defective Errors to Prevent Respondents' Case Proceedings That Are Reasonable and Definitely Correct d. The parties were identical in both suits for the same reasons and with the same reasons as the High Court. The error or omission of any jurisdiction of the law was not indicated so as to appease the Supreme Court in exercising the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Constitution, leave of appeal denied to intervene in decision \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
