THE STATE THROUGH FORCE COMMANDER, ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE, RAWALPINDI versus KHALID SHARIF
The defendants, under section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c), 14 and 15 bail, provided their affidavits after providing controversial evidence of their involvement in the crime. The commission of drug trafficking, etc., should be carefully considered by the court witnesses. In the present case, at the time of the trial, it was concluded from this aspect that the accused was involved in the commission of the crime, the Narcotic Material Stances Act. The defendants, under the guise of Section 9 (c) of 1997, had no difficulty in obtaining an affidavit from witnesses, especially after being involved in drug cases, refusing their earlier statements. , Which is why the court was considering the same issue. The facts of each case need to be looked at in their specific context so that It could be ascertained that the accused was included in the commission o f crime or not, the evidence of the witnesses recorded by the police could not be considered on the basis of the order of bail to the accused of the High Court on oath. Isolated in circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
