O XLI, R 17 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Articles 5 and Arts 168 and 181 Demand for re-appeal were not challenged because the order of application was invalid and invalid, the simple basis of which It was emphasized that this list was not provided for in Article 168 of the Limitation Act, 1908 provided that the period of 30 days from the date was provided and not the Section 5 Limitation Act, 1908, from the date of knowledge, was applicable. There was no request or prayer for. The application was not granted under XX, R 19 (2), the application had no merit, and the timely ban was excluded under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2006
